An Independent Factual Resource for District 27 Voters
DISTRICT 27 FACTS
Voter Education

How to Evaluate Campaign Claims

A plain-language guide to separating campaign promises, public positions, legislative actions, and completed results.

Campaign season brings advertisements, graphics, promises, bill numbers, and competing descriptions of the record. Those things are not all the same kind of evidence. This guide gives District 27 voters a simple way to ask: What exactly is being claimed, what source supports it, and what does that source actually prove?

The basic rule: A bill’s subject or title does not prove what a candidate believes. A campaign promise does not prove that a result happened. A budget appropriation does not prove that one person personally secured every dollar. Always match the wording to the evidence.

Six kinds of campaign information

Future plan

Campaign promise

What a candidate says they plan to do. It is a commitment to voters—not proof that the policy has happened.

Look for: a dated campaign page, advertisement, speech, recording, or written plan.

Public view

Stated position

What a candidate has said they believe about an issue or proposal. The quote must be kept in context.

Look for: a direct statement with the date and complete relevant wording.

Official action

Bill vote

A recorded action on a specific question. The chamber, date, bill edition, and vote matter.

Look for: the official roll call—not only a bill summary or campaign description.

Formal role

Sponsorship

A legislator can be listed as a primary sponsor or cosponsor. That role does not automatically prove passage or support for later substitute language.

Look for: the official bill record and sponsor listing.

Documented effort

Advocacy

Actions intended to influence policy, such as testimony, letters, public requests, or meetings.

Look for: a primary source naming the actor, date, audience, and specific action.

What happened

Completed result

A law, program action, or measurable outcome that actually occurred. Enactment alone is not proof of a real-world result.

Look for: a session law plus implementation or outcome evidence when making an impact claim.

How to read a bill’s status

Why bill editions matter: A committee substitute can replace the subject of an earlier bill. When that happens, the original title or first version should not be described as though it were the final law.

Reference: selected 2025–2026 North Carolina bills

This reference table is about the official legislative record. It does not, by itself, establish any person’s support, opposition, motive, or responsibility. Statuses should be checked again before relying on them.

BillOfficial subjectPlain-language descriptionStatusOfficial source
HB 87Educational Choice for Children ActCreates a state participation framework for a federal tax credit connected to qualifying contributions to scholarship-granting organizations. The final law differs from the bill’s earlier cell-phone subject.EnactedNCGA record
HB 674The Firearms Liberty ActA firearms-policy proposal involving concealed-handgun permits, firearm-storage arrangements, and specified less-than-lethal defensive devices at schools.Not enacted on recordNCGA record
HB 193Firearm Law RevisionsCreates a conditional pathway for authorized nonpublic-school employees or volunteers to carry firearms or stun guns on school property, with other public-safety provisions.EnactedNCGA record
HB 318The Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement ActExpands specified state and local jail, judicial, and federal immigration-enforcement coordination requirements.EnactedNCGA record
SB 378Align Medicaid Eligibility with Federal LawThe latest House substitute concerns Medicaid provider participation by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and associated entities. The bill began as an HOA measure.Not enacted on recordNCGA record
HB 926Regulatory Reform Act of 2025An enacted omnibus law affecting multiple regulatory, development, licensing, environmental, education, utility, and local-government topics.EnactedNCGA record
HB 859Local Govts/Guaranteed Income ProgramsWould restrict local governments from operating defined unconditional guaranteed-income programs unless expressly authorized.Not enacted on recordNCGA record
HB 171Equality in State Agencies/Prohibition on DEIWould limit specified DEI activities, funding, positions, training, and related practices in state and local government.Status requires recheckNCGA record
SB 227Eliminating “DEI” in Public EducationAn enacted public-education law restricting specified DEI-named units and defined practices or concepts, subject to statutory exceptions.EnactedNCGA record
SB 2572026 Appropriations ActAn enacted statewide current-operations budget with appropriations and numerous policy, tax, fee, and revenue provisions.EnactedNCGA record

Questions to ask before sharing a claim

  1. What is the exact claim—not the slogan or headline?
  2. Is it a promise, a position, a vote, sponsorship, advocacy, or a completed result?
  3. What is the primary source, and is it current?
  4. Which bill edition, chamber, date, and session are involved?
  5. Does the evidence show what the claim says—or something narrower?
  6. Are there exceptions, amendments, effective dates, or implementation limits?
  7. Would the same wording be fair if applied to every campaign?
Return to the General Election Homepage